Blog & Resources
Looking for my thoughts on everything from bioethics to movies? You came to the right place. And while you’re here, check out my free downloadable resources.
Sign up to be notified when new posts release.
About Cecil the Lion vs. abortion
To my friends criticizing the attention given to a lion when babies are being killed: I agree we need a change of heart. I agree that human life is infinitely precious. But I suggest that rather than criticizing the outrage over the lion, which is appropriate (the OT sacrificial system was still concerned with being humane to animals), we should affirm that outrage and think of it as common ground to talk about the preciousness of all life God creates. The apostle Paul looked at the altars in Athens and saw something good in them rather than condemning the Athenians for believing in false gods. He found the good impulse that he had in common with them (they worshiped an unseen god) and capitalized on it.
The Christian and Contraception: My Thoughts
Sanctity of Life Sunday
Bioethics in the News
Bioethics in the News
Still, a staggering 6.6 million children under the age of 5 still died last year, according to UNICEF. A report said nearly half of these were in five countries: Nigeria, Congo, India, Pakistan and China. (Associated Press)
A New England Journal of Medicine poll questioned readers about a hypothetical case of physician-assisted suicide and received more than 2,000 valid responses. Roughly two-thirds worldwide, including 67 percent of replies from the U.S., said they disapprove of physician-assisted suicide. (Medical Xpress)
The learning and physical disabilities that affect people with Down syndrome may be due at least in part to defective stem cell regulation throughout the body, according to researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine. (Medical Xpress)
Ketamine, the anesthetic and illegal club drug, is now being repurposed as the first rapid-acting antidepressant drug and has been lauded as possibly the biggest advance in the treatment of depression in 50 years. (Scientific American)
Got $63,000 to spare? Maybe you want to freeze a backup of your adult self for potential use decades later. (Vancouver Sun)
The emergence of superbugs has made it imperative to search for novel methods, which can combat the microbial resistance. Thus, application of nanotechnology in pharmaceuticals and microbiology is gaining importance to prevent the catastrophic consequences of antibiotic resistance. (Nanowerk)
The hourly revenue generated by a physician discussing plans for care is $87. That same physician, when conducting a procedure such as a colonoscopy or a cataract extraction, will make more than $300 per hour. Renewed support for a bill that would better compensate U.S. doctors for providing end-of-life counseling highlights the value of these conversations; for patients, physicians, and the healthcare system. (The Atlantic)
A genetic link specific to risk of childhood leukemia has now been identified, according to a team at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital and other institutions. The discovery was reported online today in the journal Nature Genetics. (Medical Xpress)
Bioethics: Making Headlines
Lots of interesting developments inthe field of bioethics this week. Take a look at these top stories, reported bythe Deerfield, Illinois, Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity:
Most detailed 3D map of human brain Adeceased 65-year-old woman has provided scientists with the material for thefirst super high-resolution, three-dimensional digital model of the humanbrain. (The Telegraph)
FDA approves morning after pill for women of childbearing age TheU.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Plan B emergencycontraceptive without a prescription for all women of childbearing age,officials say. (UPI)
In new tools to combat epidemics, the key is context Now a newproject called BioMosaic is building a more comprehensive picture offoreign-borne disease threats in the United States, by merging three separatedata tools into a single app for guiding decisions at the time of an outbreak.(New York Times)
HPV vaccine is credited in fall of teenagers’ infection rate Theprevalence of dangerous strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV) the mostcommon sexually transmitted infection in the US and a principal cause ofcervical cancer, has dropped by half among teenage girls in recent years, astriking measure of success for a vaccine against the virus that was introducedonly in seven years ago. (New York Times)
Egypt girl’s death puts spotlight on genitial mutilation The deathof a 13-year-old girl during a genital mutilation procedure has brought theissue back into the spotlight in Egypt. While some Egyptians fight for eradicationof the practice, others justify it in on religious grounds. (BBC)
New study tracks emotional health of “surrogate kids” Over thepast decade the number of births involving surrogacy with donor eggs and spermhas surged. What, experts wondered, does this mean for the mental and emotionalhealth of the growing number of kids who may or may not know the truth abouttheir distinctive origins? (Today)
Japan experts mull rules on chimeric embryos Japaneseexperts were on Tuesday set to discuss rules for experiments with animal-humanembryos, as scientists seek permission for tests that could see human organsproduced inside the growing body of an animal. (Fox News) Another news story suggested that human organs could be grown in animalswithin a year. (The Telegraph)
Abortion restrictions in states Forty-onestates have enacted abortion restrictions at different stages of pregnancy. (New York Times)
High court rules ‘pay-for-delay’ drug deals can face antitrustsuits A brand-name drug maker can be sued for violating antitrustlaws if it agrees to pay a potential competitor to delay selling a genericversion, the Supreme Court ruled. (Los Angeles Times)
Be prepared for the big genome leak Mostpeople in the US could soon know someone whose genome is held in a researchdatabase. Concerns are growing about our ability to control access to thatinformation. But many scientists feel that restricting access to genomic datafetters research. How long will it be until an idealistic and technicallyliterate researcher deliberately releases genome and trait information publiclyin the name of open science? (Nature)
Directed in vitro (IVF) technique may increase insulinresistance among offspring A special type of IVF may increase the riskfor insulin resistance among high-tech babies. (E! Science News)
IVF: First baby born using ’safer’ method In aworld first, a healthy baby has been born using a “safer” method of theinfertility treatment IVF, using a natural hormone to kick-start his mother’sovaries. (BBC)
Surrogate Refuses Offer of $10,000 to Abort
The Gosnell Travesty
—Kirsten Powers,
USA Today
Bioethics in the News
The Center for Bioethics and Human Dignity sends out a listing of top bioethics stories for the week. Some interesting stuff here:
Better prenatal testing does not mean more abortion
Between 70 and 85 percent of women in the U.S. confronted with a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome choose abortion but that number used to be higher. (The Atlantic)
Morning-after pills don’t cause abortion, studies say
The most heated part of the fight between the Obama administration and religious groups over new rules that require most health plans to cover contraception actually has nothing to do with birth control. It has to do with abortion. (NPR) [For all my past postings about this, search for Plan B in this blog in the right-column search engine.]
Stem cell-based bioartificial tissues and organs
Surgeon Paolo Macchiarini has made his name by successfully transplanting bioengineered stem cell-based trachea, composed of both artificial and biological material. He now plans to use the technique to recreate more complex tissues, such as the esophagus and diaphragm or organs such as the heart and lungs. (Science Daily)
Organ trafficking, a new crime of the 21st century
Organ transplant medicine is an incredible life-saving technology, under the right circumstances. Unfortunately, due to a shortage of available organs, a new crime of the 21st century, organ trafficking, is supplying organs to people with the money to pay big dollars for a new life. (The Epoch Times)
Why death is not the end of your social media life
Services such as LivesOn and DeadSocial plan to keep your friends and family updated on your Twitter and Facebook pages, even after you have passed away. (The Guardian )
A genetic code for genius?
In China, a research project aims to find the roots of intelligence in our DNA; searching for the supersmart. (Wall Street Journal )
Frozen embryo outcomes mixed
Frozen embryos yielded better birth outcomes on some measures compared with fresh embryos in vitro fertilization, but there were some concerning signals of big babies and excess early mortality, a Nordic population-based study indicated. (Med Page Today )
No increased cancer risk after IVF: Study
Women getting fertility treatments can be reassured that in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not increase their risk of breast and gynecological cancers, according to a new study of Israeli women. (NBC News )
Bioethics in the News
Bioethics in the News
Bioethics News
CBHD Academy of Fellows ConsultationShould we be able to create synthetic sperm and eggs for reproductive purposes? Will children born from such procedures be at elevated risk for biological and/or sociological problems?
Explore cutting-edge ethical and theological questions surrounding the development of novel procedures in the artificial creation of human gametes.
Saturday, November 3rd, 2012
10am to 5:30pm
Trinity International University
Kantzer Hall - KANT 141
Admission is free but registration is required
Uruguay’s Senate approved a bill on Wednesday that allows women to have abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy for any reason, opening the way for one of the most sweeping abortion rights laws in Latin America. (New York Times)
Over my dead body
Helping the terminally ill to die, once taboo, is gaining acceptance. (The Economist)
Synthetic biology raises playing God fears
Is it safe to let humans play God and create new organisms - animals and plants - that have never existed in Mother Nature? The ongoing UN Convention on Biodiversity here [Hyderabad] is going to address this question on Friday evening, when it decides if countries need to put their heads together to study the new field of synthetic biology. (Times of India)
California enacts landmark legislation giving same sex parents via surrogacy equal parenting rights
California has taken the unprecedented step of changing the legal definition of “intended parent” to be “an individual, married or unmarried,” making it legislatively illegal to discriminate against same sex parents both before and after their children are born from surrogacy arrangements. (Sacramento Bee)
Blood or bone marrow better for stem cell transplants?
Study found no survival differences, but blood cells may be associated with more chronic side effects.
(U.S. News and World Report)
Stem cells from cadavers? Pluripotent stem cells can be derived from dead bodies, research shows
Death will come for us all one day, but life will not fade from our bodies all at once. After our lungs stop breathing, our hearts stop beating, our minds stop racing, our bodies cool, and long after our vital signs cease, little pockets of cells can live for days, even weeks. Now scientists have harvested such cells from the scalps and brain linings of human corpses and reprogrammed them into stem cells. (Huffington Post)
Shinya Yamanaka interview: 2012 Nobel Prize winner on stem-cells, ethics and the future of medicine
In a conversation with Technology Academy Finland (TAF) at the time of his winning the Millennium Technology Prize earlier this year, and published today exclusively by the Huffington Post, Shinya Yamanaka said a future in which medical drugs are made to order is closer than ever. (Huffington Post)
Should we ration end-of-life care?
A panel debated the pros and cons of both sides in the latest edition of Intelligence Squared U.S. They faced off two against two in an Oxford-style debate on the motion “Ration End-of-Life Care.” (NPR)
Claims of first human stem cell trial unravels
It has been a crazy week for stem cell research. After the high of a Nobel prize for Japan’s Shinya Yamanaka, the pioneer of cellular reprogramming, events took an alarming and surreal turn when a little-known compatriot Hisashi Moriguchi claimed to have already run a clinical trial in which similarly reprogrammed cells were injected into people. (New Scientist)
Tracking a killer: Cell phones aid a pioneering malaria study in Kenya
A pioneering study into malaria transmission in Kenya, using data gleaned from the cell phones of nearly 15 million people, has given scientists new clues into how the deadly disease spreads. (CNN)
Bioethics in the News
Brave New (Fallen) World
It's been quite a week for ethical issues in the NY Times.
Yesterday's top headline was about how researchers mapped a fetus's genome before its birth using samples from the mother's hair and father's saliva. The announcement holds a lot of promise--but a lot of creepiness. Will parents abort when they realize the baby they're carrying will have any one of (or a combo of) factors considered unideal? What do you think?
Then in today's top stories, David Brooks writes an opinion piece that contrasts our morality when we viewed ourselves as depraved in the past generation compared with our current view of ourselves as "pretty good people." Guess which group was more likely to justify a little pilfering?
Anti-Reductionism
I don't know about you, but a long time ago I grew weary and wary of people "reducing" the Bible down to two culture-war issues: abortion and gay marriage.
The good news is that I think we're making some serious progress in changing that mentality. I just returned from the national meeting of the Evangelical Press Association where I heard keynote addresses and attended workshops that challenged such thinking. We discussed "war" as a metaphor and how much it stinks as a label for how to engage the marketplace. People die and get maimed in war.
In the words of Jonathan Merritt, a Liberty University grad and son of a former head of the SBC, "Should the church fight for the lives of the unborn? Absolutely. But can Christians afford to ignore the 3 million already-living who will die from preventable water-related diseases this year? What about the 1.2 billion people without access to safe drinking water? And what of the 1-million-plus Africans who will unnecessarily die of malaria in the next 12 months?"
Can I get an "Amen"?
In one workshop the coordinator handed out a copy of Youthworker magazine in which the above words appeared. I read the entire article and loved it. It gave words to how I feel about politics: "Many Christians...[refuse] to align with either side. Rather than red or blue, many Christians tend to be a comfortable shade of purple."Yup. That's me. Color me purple.
To read Jonathan's article, "Anti-Reductionism: Saving the Bible from Culture Warriors," adapted with permission from his book A Faith of our Own: Following Jesus Beyond the Culture Wars, go here.
Bioethics in the News
The Vanishing Little Girl
In an op-ed that ran on CNN, a professor of bioethics at the University of Montreal asked, “Is gender selection of a fetus ethical?” Dr. Vardit Ravitsky discusses the new maternal blood test announced last week in the Journal of the American Medical Association—the test I mentioned that can determine a baby’s sex as early as seven weeks’ gestation. The technology has potential for good, like confirming “it’s a girl” for a mom carrying a baby she fears is carrying an abnormality passed only to boys. But even before the test is on the market, it has ignited a firestorm of ethics conversations because of its potential for evil. Think especially of countries where people want boy babies and not girl babies. A mom gets the test (or her husband/lover forces her to), discovers she's carrying a girl, and gets an abortion. We know that in China in 2005, for example, there were 32 million more men under 20 than women. That’s gender discrimination at its most chilling: Keep females from even making it into the world and you don’t have to discriminate against them once they arrive. While research in the US suggests that about as many parents want girls as boys, consider that here we more easily rationalize abortion the earlier in the pregnancy it takes place. So the test would make rationalizing abortion even easier. At the moment in the United States, any woman has the legal right to terminate a pregnancy in the first trimester without providing any reason. That’s her legal right. Dr. Vavitsky writes, “Rejecting an otherwise wanted and healthy fetus solely on the basis of its sex provides poor justification, making sex selection for non-medical reasons an ethically dubious choice even as early as seven weeks.… While promising significant benefits from a medical perspective, [the test] raises serious social and ethical concerns." I'll say!Ethicist Arthur Caplin weighed in on the conversation in an article published by MetroWest Daily News. He said, “Everything about the early testing of fetal genes for sex identification spells ethical trouble. And, as the techniques for the analysis of fetal DNA become more and more accurate and affordable, it is likely to reshape the debate over abortion…. And there are plenty of people around the world who are eager to have boys rather than girls. There are already thriving industries in old-fashioned genetic testing purely for sex selection.” He believes we will see a modest sex-selection business in the U.S. complementing what is already big business in India and China. He concludes, “Being male or female is not a disease or a disorder. Wanting a boy is a preference, but it is not one that justifies ending a pregnancy. But ending a pregnancy because you don't want a girl may be legal in the U.S., but that does not make it an ethical choice.”
Abortion and Sex-Selection
This morning's New York Times ran a powerful piece on the ramifications of abortion worldwide in terms of sex selection. Women across the globe abort daughters because more honor comes to them when they birth sons. And their ability to do that came largely from the West's influence and aid.
We cannot call this a male-against-female crime committed due to patriarchy. Women are as complicit as men. This is a powerful-against-powerless issue. The end result (so far) is that 160 females' lives have been extinguished. New ramifications: More kidnapping of females, sex trafficking, and prostitution.
The Wanted and Unwanted Unborn
Today's NYT had a good article about the dilemmas faced both by those wanting to conceive and those who wish they hadn't.
Expanding Our View on Sanctity of Life
Yesterday was Sanctity of Life Sunday. In the Christian community when we think of sanctity of life, we often limit our discourse to abortion. Yet we need to expand that conversation to include the taking of any innocent life:
Abortion
Active euthanasia
Nuclear bombs
Darfur
Embryonic stem cell research
Eugenics
Unlimited in vitro fertilization
The disposability of girls in China
Widows expected to commit suicide upon the deaths of their husbands
Moving beyond sanctity of life we also need to consider that "human dignity" is also grounded in Genesis 1. That has ramifications for...
Sex trafficking
Refusal of hydrating tubes
Slavery
POW standards
Immigration policy
Homelessness
Hunger
Poverty
I think politicians in both parties have taken too a high a view of humans at times. Unsupervised commerce fails to check greed, leading to economic disaster. And assuming that "a woman and her doctor" will interpret "the life of the mother" as applying only to life-and-death situations...?